Don't mix...
Embed a video from YouTube or wherever: Something of relevance. Something important to our culture, our society, history. And then, a few weeks later *poof* the video is gone. Removed by the user or removed by the service. Napolitano's "apology" to veterans? Gone.
Well, save a local copy I guess.
Video-blogging is pointless it seems.
Rep. Michele Bachmann Independence Institute Speech
A wake up call speech deliver August 31st in Denver presented by The Independence Institute. Yes, it will be worth your time to hear it in it's entirety...
The Independence Institute presents... Michele Bachmann
The Independence Institute presents... Michele Bachmann
Jon Stewart Smacks Down Mainstream Media
Wha...? REALLY! I know it's unbelievable. He lets ACORN AND the media have it.
No really. I'm serious! Yes, THAT Jon Stewart. Oh just watch the video...
No really. I'm serious! Yes, THAT Jon Stewart. Oh just watch the video...
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| The Audacity of Hos | ||||
| ||||
North American Union
Just a couple of links on the topic for future reference from the Council on Foreign Relations:
Building a North American Community
English PDF
Creating a North American Community: Chairmen’s Statement
English PDF
Building a North American Community
English PDF
Creating a North American Community: Chairmen’s Statement
English PDF
America: It Ain't No More Ok
My take on the current political/internet buzz:
I saw this yesterday on HotAir. Pretty sad no matter how you take it...
Honestly, I think the police officer just might have misspoke out of frustration & nervousness in front of the camera. But taking all of his statements together throughout the video like, "I can charge you whatever I want to charge you" didn't do anything to assuage the notion that this was politically motivated. I don't know. I can't read his mind, but I can form an opinion based on what he did and said...
The bigger question, (if the officer wasn't making up his own rules) who in the heck gave orders that folks could not carry signs (with or without pictures) on public property?!?! Every time I go to vote at my polling place, A PUBLIC SCHOOL, there are political signs (and guys telling me who to vote for) all over the place! Outside of course. Not inside...
If the protagonist was inside attending the meeting? I don't know, maybe they might be able to tell him "no signs at all" depending on whether it was a public or private event or whatever--maybe... But outside? Nope. No way... Not on public grounds.
It was freaky when that balding mustachioed guy--some kind of what? School administrator?--said (regarding First Amendment rights): "Actually school grounds have very different First Amendment rights then anywhere else." What the heck was that? What the heck does he mean by that?! Who was that guy? School employee or official? Yes? Then he definitely needs a school district smack-down for certain.
If someone actually gave "marching orders" to this officer to do this, who was it? Did the officer make the rules up himself? If he did, then he definitely should receive some kind of disciplinary action--up to firing. If he didn't and was just doing "as ordered", then whoever ordered him to do this should be held accountable as well.
If this is indicative of "making up the rules as we roll along" for the next three-plus years, it is not a good sign....
I saw this yesterday on HotAir. Pretty sad no matter how you take it...
Honestly, I think the police officer just might have misspoke out of frustration & nervousness in front of the camera. But taking all of his statements together throughout the video like, "I can charge you whatever I want to charge you" didn't do anything to assuage the notion that this was politically motivated. I don't know. I can't read his mind, but I can form an opinion based on what he did and said...
The bigger question, (if the officer wasn't making up his own rules) who in the heck gave orders that folks could not carry signs (with or without pictures) on public property?!?! Every time I go to vote at my polling place, A PUBLIC SCHOOL, there are political signs (and guys telling me who to vote for) all over the place! Outside of course. Not inside...
If the protagonist was inside attending the meeting? I don't know, maybe they might be able to tell him "no signs at all" depending on whether it was a public or private event or whatever--maybe... But outside? Nope. No way... Not on public grounds.
It was freaky when that balding mustachioed guy--some kind of what? School administrator?--said (regarding First Amendment rights): "Actually school grounds have very different First Amendment rights then anywhere else." What the heck was that? What the heck does he mean by that?! Who was that guy? School employee or official? Yes? Then he definitely needs a school district smack-down for certain.
If someone actually gave "marching orders" to this officer to do this, who was it? Did the officer make the rules up himself? If he did, then he definitely should receive some kind of disciplinary action--up to firing. If he didn't and was just doing "as ordered", then whoever ordered him to do this should be held accountable as well.
If this is indicative of "making up the rules as we roll along" for the next three-plus years, it is not a good sign....
A White House Internet
It's back!
I was hoping this had died, but that is not the case.
Today's big tech news is the return of legislative proposals to grant the White House power over the Internet. The "ability" to shut down parts of the net in case of a "cyber-attack". Just how they think they would go about doing that would be interesting, but just the fact that they want that kind of power is telling.
It goes beyond that, they want power to regulate private networks. The EFF is not happy, rightly so. Speaking of, this isn't a left or right issue. This should be concerning to everyone.
CNET: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
ZDNet: White House not equipped to hold keys to the Internet
FoxNews: Senate Bill Would Give President Emergency Control of Internet
Slashdot Denizens are (unsurprisingly) not pleased...
I was hoping this had died, but that is not the case.
Today's big tech news is the return of legislative proposals to grant the White House power over the Internet. The "ability" to shut down parts of the net in case of a "cyber-attack". Just how they think they would go about doing that would be interesting, but just the fact that they want that kind of power is telling.
It goes beyond that, they want power to regulate private networks. The EFF is not happy, rightly so. Speaking of, this isn't a left or right issue. This should be concerning to everyone.
CNET: Bill would give president emergency control of Internet
ZDNet: White House not equipped to hold keys to the Internet
FoxNews: Senate Bill Would Give President Emergency Control of Internet
Slashdot Denizens are (unsurprisingly) not pleased...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)